The Secretary – Treasurer noted the comments received from:
- Correspondence was received from seven area residents expressing objections for the subject application.
- A memorandum was received from Ward Councillor Ras expressing concerns for the application.
Two area residents appeared before the Committee and objected the application. Their objections included; variances are not minor in nature and the character of the neighbourhood was not being maintained.
One area resident appeared before the Committee and asked questions regarding the front yard setback of the proposed dwelling.
Committee asked questions of the agent who appeared before the Committee.
The applicant wished to amend the heritage planning condition, however the Committee did not grant the request.
DECISION
Committee has taken into consideration, on balance, any and all submissions made before its decision including eight written submissions, and three oral submissions.
The Committee, having considered all relevant materials including: information provided by the applicant, plans submitted, and staff and agency comments, is not satisfied that the application will result in the proper and orderly development of the municipality.
The Committee, having regard to those matters under subsection 51(24) of the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, as amended, resolves to refuse to grant consent as the application did not satisfy the requirements.