The Secretary – Treasurer noted the comments received from:
- Correspondence was received from one area resident expressing objections for the subject application.
Two area residents spoke before the Committee and expressed concerns for the application and objected the size of the Gazebo.
Committee asked questions of the agent who appeared before the Committee.
Committee discussed if the structure should be considered an accessory structure or a covered porch.
- Herczeg, Planning and Building Department spoke regarding that the structure is to be considered as an accessory structure and that the height is nominal in nature.
DECISION
The applicant requested that the application be amended and Committee agreed to the request.
Committee has taken into consideration, on balance, any and all submissions made before its decision including one written submission and two oral submissions. They have also considered all relevant materials including: information provided by the applicant, plans submitted, and staff and agency comments, and the majority of the members have determined that the application is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development on the subject property, and that the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law and the Official Plan are maintained.