Committee of Adjustment

Meeting #:
Date:
Time:
-
Location:
Online Video Conference
Members
  • Sebastian Patrizio, (Chair)
  • David George
  • John Page
  • David Kennedy
  • Wajeeha Shahrukh
  • David Cook
  • John Kwast

ROCKY & IDA JACKELINE IERACI

1473 KALLIGAN COURT

No public comments were received as a result of the public circulation of this application.

 

Committee asked questions of the agent who appeared before the Committee regarding the extent of the addition.

 

Committee has taken into consideration, on balance, any and all submissions made before its decision. They have also considered all relevant materials including: information provided by the applicant, plans submitted, and staff and agency comments, and the majority of the members have determined that the application is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development on the subject property, and that the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law and the Official Plan are maintained.

 

Accordingly, the Committee resolves to authorize and grant the request.

 



MOVED BY:

D. George

CARRIED

 

The Decision of the Committee is:

APPLICATION APPROVED:

To allow the construction of an addition on the subject property proposing:

  1. An easterly side yard measured to the second storey of 1.69m whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum side yard measured to the second storey of 1.81m in this instance; and
  2. A westerly side yard measured to the second storey of 1.65m whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum side yard measured to the second storey of 1.81m in this instance.

JESSICA & BARRIE NAYLOR

2076 SHAWANAGA TRAIL

The Secretary – Treasurer noted the comments received from:

  • Correspondence was received from one area resident expressing objections to the subject application.

 

Committee asked questions of the agent who appeared before the Committee regarding the existing setbacks and the size of the addition.

 

The applicant requested that the application be amended and Committee agreed to the request.

 

Committee has taken into consideration, on balance, any and all submissions made before its decision including 1 written submission. They have also considered all relevant materials including: information provided by the applicant, plans submitted, and staff and agency comments, and the majority of the members have determined that the application is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development on the subject property, and that the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law and the Official Plan are maintained.

 

Accordingly, the Committee resolves to authorize and grant the request.

 



MOVED BY:

D. George

CARRIED

 

The Decision of the Committee is:

 

APPLICATION APPROVED AS AMENDED SUBJECT TO CONDITION(S):

 

To allow the construction of a new house on the subject property proposing:

  1. A lot coverage of 25.43% of the lot area whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, permits a maximum lot coverage of 25.00% of the lot area in this instance; and
  2. A southeasterly side yard of 1.20m whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum side yard of 4.20m in this instance.

 

CONDITION(S):

  1. Construction related to this variance shall be in general conformance with the Site Plan approved by the Committee.

JOEL PHILP

257 QUEEN STREET SOUTH

No public comments were received as a result of this public circulation of this application.

Committee asked questions of the agent who appeared before the Committee regarding the parking study and the accessible parking spaces. Committee discussed the merit of approving a minor variance to allow 0 accessible parking spaces but imposing a condition to require an accessible parking space as the existing space may be undersized and therefore not considered accessible under the Zoning By-law.

 

The applicant requested that the application be amended and Committee agreed to the request.

 

Committee has taken into consideration, on balance, any and all submissions made before its decision including 1 written submission. They have also considered all relevant materials including: information provided by the applicant, plans submitted, and staff and agency comments, and the majority of the members have determined that the application is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development on the subject property, and that the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law and the Official Plan are maintained.

 

Accordingly, the Committee resolves to authorize and grant the request.

 



MOVED BY:

J. Page

CARRIED

 

The Decision of the Committee is:

APPLICATION APPROVED AS AMENDED SUBJECT TO TERM(S) AND/OR CONDITION(S):

To allow the operation of a karate studio proposing:

  1. An aisle width of 2.30m whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum aisle width of 7.00m in this instance;
  2. 20 parking spaces whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum of 45 parking spaces in this instance; and
  3. 0 accessible parking space whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum of 2 accessible parking spaces in this instance;
  4. To permit parking off-site whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires all parking to be located on-site in this instance.

 

CONDITION(S):

For Variances 2 & 4:

  1. The applicant shall make satisfactory arrangements to provide parking off-site and, if necessary, enter into any agreements.

For Variances 1, 2 & 4:

  1. Construction related to this variance shall be in general conformance with the Site Plan approved by the Committee.

 

TERM(S):

  1. One parking space on-site shall be reserved and signed for the exclusive use of holders of accessible parking permits.

VEERPAL GILL & SHINDER BRAR

7661 REDSTONE ROAD

No public comments were received as a result of this public circulation of this application.

 

Committee asked questions of the agent who appeared before the Committee.

 

Committee has taken into consideration, on balance, any and all submissions made before its decision including 1 written submission. They have also considered all relevant materials including: information provided by the applicant, plans submitted, and staff and agency comments, and the majority of the members have determined that the application is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development on the subject property, and that the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law and the Official Plan are maintained.

 

Accordingly, the Committee resolves to authorize and grant the request.

 



MOVED BY:

J. Page

CARRIED

 

The Decision of the Committee is:

 

APPLICATION APPROVED:

 

To allow the construction of a new home on the subject property proposing:

  1. A lot coverage of 30.82% (188.48sq.m) of the lot area whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, permits a maximum lot coverage of 30.00% (183.47sq.m) of the lot area in this instance; and
  2. A gross floor area of 336.18sq.m whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, permits a maximum gross floor area of 272.31sq.m in this instance.

BRAD COMRIE & AMANDA MCMURDO

6181 STARFIELD CRESCENT

No public comments were received as a result of this public circulation of this application.

 

Committee asked questions of the agent who appeared before the Committee.

 

Committee has taken into consideration, on balance, any and all submissions made before its decision including 1 petition. They have also considered all relevant materials including: information provided by the applicant, plans submitted, and staff and agency comments, and the majority of the members have determined that the application is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development on the subject property, and that the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law and the Official Plan are maintained.

 

Accordingly, the Committee resolves to authorize and grant the request.

 



MOVED BY:

J. Page

CARRIED

 

The Decision of the Committee is:

 

APPLICATION APPROVED:

 

The applicant requests the Committee to approve a minor variance to permit an inground swimming pool, proposing a rear yard set back to a G1 Zone of 1.54m whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum rear yard set back to a G1 Zone of 5.00m in this instance.